Entrepreneurship Adrian Teh Co-Founder of Highrisepro Published 4 years ago on December 30, 2013 By The Asian Entrepreneur Authors & Contributors Share Tweet Ruby on Rails engineer with over 5 years of experience in UI & UX design, business management and lean startup entrepreneurship, Adrian received his double major degree in data communications and enterprise systems with high distinction from the University of Queensland, Australia. After his three year career as a business process reengineering (BPR) consultant with Diethelm Keller Siber Hegner (DKSH), one of the largest Swiss based logistics and distribution company in SEA, he decided it was time for a change and started a web development agency with his business partner, Yuvan in Malaysia. Equipped with his global business consulting experience across 9 countries in Europe and Asia & his passion for software engineering, he delivered numerous web & consulting projects ranging from small to large enterprise systems, during which he launched, Highrisepro, a SaaS online property management solution for highrise condominiums in Asia. What exactly is Highrisepro? Highrisepro is an online property management solution for highrise condominiums, developed to solve the financial, communication and management problems facing condo associations, property managers and homeowners / tenants when it comes to the maintenance and management of their condominium building. How did you come up with the idea of Highrisepro? It was right after I got married that my wife and I decided to move into a highrise condominium in Kuala Lumpur. Having lived in only a landed property, I was surprised by the amount of responsibilities and management tasks condo owners have to face when I first learned that we are responsible for the maintenance and management of the condominium through a condo association. Simply said, elected volunteering homeowners of the condo building will form a committee that acts as a representative to all the other home owners in the building to make decisions in regards to the overall maintenance and management of the building. I was curious, hence I ended up joining the committee board. There was many issues and matters that needed the consensus of all the home owners in the building. It’s easy when there’s only a few, but the condo that I lived in had 250 units across 21 floors. We tried using their mailboxes for printed materials, but the responses was bad. In the end, we had to go floor by floor, unit by unit, in order to get petitions signed or any important news announced. Besides that, as I was travelling very often at that time, it was hard for me to keep tabs on what’s happening in my condominium, especially when we had just received our keys and there’re lots of important matters to check on (i.e. disputes with developers, house rules, condo infrastructure issues and fixes, etc). There was just no way for me to find out on what is happening. Even if I was at home, I had to walk all the way to the wall bulletin board down at the lobby to find out latest updates. Further to that, as most of us (residents) start our daily commute at 6:30am and back by 7:00pm, there was no way the management office was open by the time we got back home to handle our condo payments or submit any complaints / work requests for things that we needed to be fixed. We would need to wait for the weekends for a short window of time. It was also very apparent to the condo association that the residents don’t seem to appreciate the volunteering work that we, the condo association, were doing for the entire building. I soon realized that it was all a communication problem. The residents are not aware of the effort that we’ve put in as volunteers, not because they choose to ignore, but because they were uninformed about it. There was a communication barrier. We live in an Internet world today where we pretty much get most of our things done through some kind of web service / tool like Facebook for getting connected to friends, Google Mail for sending out emails, and Basecamp for managing projects. There must be some kind of tool out there for condominium dwellers to help with the communication and management problems we were facing. After having scoured the web, nothing befitting was found. I was really surprised. That was when I shared the idea with my business partner, Yuvan and the rest was history. Could you walk us through the process of starting up Highrisepro? It started off as just a pet project for my own condominium. No commercial plans. We deployed it for my condominium and the response was great. It started with only the condo association members and a few residents. But as soons as the residents came to know of an online portal that they can go to, to read about announcements, submit their complaints, comment on important matters, the adoption rate went through the condo roof. People started talking about matters raised by residents in the portal. More residents were attending the monthly meetings. Residents started to understand the responsibilities and issues the condo association have to face maintaining and managing the building. Feedbacks, ideas and suggestions started coming in from the residents, even those that lives abroad (foreign investors). Not long after, we realized that the online portal we’ve setup had became the guiding light to help us find out what the residents are thinking, what their thoughts are and what matters to them most. The condo association were no longer managing the building by themselves. The entire building residents are now helping out in managing the entire building. A few neighbouring condominiums caught notice about our online portal and have asked if we could set it up for them. For a minimal fee, we decided to set it up and that’s when we learn that there’s a possible commercial possibility to this whole online condo portal. At that time, to us, it was just an online condo portal. Little that we know, it would, in the end, become an online property management solution as it is today. How has it been like managing the business since? Roller Coaster Ride! Tons of downs and a few ups that keeps us going till this date. When we decided to go commercial, there were a ton of questions that needed to be answered: “Are other condos facing the same problem?”, “Will there be enough condominiums that would want to use our tool for us to make a decent profit?”, “How do we build a SoftwareasaService application?”, “How much should we charge?”. We decided to find answer to the most important question “Are we solving something worth pursuing as a business?”. We were not the wealthiest and there’s no funding options out there at that time either. We decided to go on a bootstrap. Taking on consulting jobs while working on developing Highrisepro. Naturally, we were very conservative in our spendings. We needed more validation. Hence we started an interview frenzy with any condominium and property management agencies we could get. In the end, we interview almost close to 30 condominiums (lowrise, highrise, highend, lowend) and property management companies. Today, we are still constantly validating our solution with the market. Every new feature that we’ve introduced are 100% based on the feedback we’ve gathered from condo associations, property managers and residents. Besides constantly cracking our heads up on how to make our buyer experience cycle better for our new customers, we are also constantly looking at ways to improve our product while keeping our focus on expanding our reach to more condominiums. Did you find anything particularly difficult during the startup? How did you overcome it? Learning about the problems and validating our solution was the tough part. Developing the platform was the easy part. Marketing our product to the target customer segment was the hard part. There weren’t any channel that exists today for us to market our solution to condo associations or property management agencies. Nothing comes to mind (on the Internet) when it comes to condo maintenance and management, even up till now. It took us a while to understand that our solution might just be a few years ahead of our time. A lot of education is required and a lot of time needs to be spent on reaching out the the condos that we know have all these problems that Highrisepro can solve. They just don’t know about us yet. How was the initial reaction from the consumers? Did they buy into the product/service? Skeptical, especially when we first offered Highrisepro for FREE (Fremium model). We learned by surprise that condo associations aren’t into FREE services. They were more worried about their privacy. But as soon as we started charging, they started to take us more seriously and wanted to find out more. Took us a while before we manage to get our message clear, but as soon as they know exactly how we can help them solve their problems, the rest was easy. Do you face a lot of competition in this industry? What is your strategy against your competition? We are still ahead of time when it comes to online property management software in Asia. As compared to the US / NA, where using an online tool to help manage condo buildings is a common thing, there are a lot more options to choose from for condo associations / property managers. When we first started as just a pet project, there weren’t any competition at all in Asia. Blogs and Facebook was considered our competition if I had to name a few. Today, there are a few other online solutions that is comparable to what we do and we are happy about that. Simply because the Asia market is too big for any single player and the fact that we’re still struggling to educate the market about online property management solutions, we need more players out there to help us with the education process. It’s a good sign that we’re heading in the right direction. What can you tell us about the industry? Have you developed any industry insights that you could share? In terms of the numbers, there are more condo building today than there were 10 years ago due to population growth and land scarcity and the numbers are just going to go up. In Malaysia alone there are at least 500,000 condo units in the market as of 2012 with almost 1,100 new condo units being introduced into the market each year. Not to mention the condo market in Indonesia, Thailand and Philippines that are just starting up as compared to the ones in Singapore and Hong Kong. There are tons of insights that we’ve learned, some are revelating and some, quite disappointing. Besides nailing down the problems that matters most to condo dwellers, we have come to understand that not all stakeholders are aligned with us when it comes to making things easier and more convenient for condo dwellers. To understand better, we’ll first need to understand the stakeholders involved in a typical condo building. There are the condo associations committee members (elected representatives of the condo), the building manager (hired to manage the daily tasks), the homeowners and tenants that makes up the residents of the building as well as the property developer. We have learned that each stakeholders mentioned faces their own individual problems. Condo association members find it difficult to reach out to the residents and find it hard to gain control of the condo management. Building managers find themselves drowned in lots of admin paperwork while having to juggle the daily operational tasks. Residents needs more transparency from their management, always wanting to know more about what’s happening to their condo funds and issues raised. Property developers in the other hand have to be a part of the condo association committee, at least for the first few years after hand over of property to resolve any infrastructure matters. It was revealing to us when we find that our solution not only helped them in terms of communication and management but also resulted in improving their finances. This came as a surprise to us. A new pleasant find I should say. It’s quite logical come to think of it. As residents became more informed about what is happening, they eventually became more involved and understood better, that in order to increase the value of their assets, let alone protecting it, they will need to pay up the condo fees, so that the management can pay the various service vendors to upkeep the building. And as we introduced online payment into Highrisepro, it further improved their monthly collections, as some of the homeowners are frequent travellers and foreign investors living abroad. Armaneecondo.com is a great example, where collection rate improved from a mere 80% per month to a staggering 110%. Residents started paying in advance by several months! The disappointing ones were quite surprising as well. As we move towards identifying channels that we can leverage on to market our solution, we’ve identified property developers as one of them. But having approached more than half a dozen prominent property developers in Malaysia, we have learnt that making the lives of condo residents better, postsales, isn’t something they’re willing to invest in. We can understand that, as conventionally, building quality buildings, securing sales and handing over the keys has been the only focus of the entire industry for decades. Making condo dweller’s lives better, post sales, just isn’t going to yield a return on investments. This is something that we believe will change. We believe that if property developers were to share our passion in creating a better integrated living experience for condo owners, they will have an extra edge in marketing their new projects and in turn increase sales, not just from new buyers, but also from existing customers. How have you managed to stay relevant in this industry? We’re constantly learning from our existing customers on how to improve existing features and introduce new ones. Our customers has been the “developer” of Highrisepro. Almost 90% of the features are requested by them. Staying relevant to us is as simple as constantly asking ourselves the question “Are we solving problem that matters to our customers” If we still are, then we believe we will always be relevant. Related Topics:asiaAustraliabadbusinesscommoncustomersEducationEntrepreneurshipFocusfundinggrowthHong KongIndonesiainterviewinvestorsmalaysiaMarketingmenewsonlinepaysingaporestartupvalue Continue Reading You may like Will Financial Liberalisation Trigger a Crisis in China? Georges Tchokoua Women on Top in Tech – Chrissa McFarlane, Founder and CEO of Patientory Why Angel Investors are Shaking Up the Global Startup Scene Emmanuelle Norchet Myths & Facts about Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship Will Financial Liberalisation Trigger a Crisis in China? Published 7 hours ago on April 25, 2018 By The Asian Entrepreneur Authors & Contributors The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has been liberalizing its financial system for nearly 4 decades. While it now has a comprehensive financial system with a large number of financial institutions and large financial assets, its financial policies are still highly repressive. These repressive financial policies are now a major hindrance to the PRC’s economic growth. The PRC is at the beginning of a new wave of financial liberalization that is necessary for supporting the country’s strong economic growth. The country’s leaders have already unveiled a comprehensive program of financial reform, which includes 11 specific reform measures in three broad areas: creating a level-playing field (such as allowing private banks and developing inclusive finance), freeing the market mechanism (such as reforming interest rate and exchange rate regimes and achieving capital account convertibility), and improving regulation. But could financial liberalization lead to a major financial crisis in the PRC? What would be the consequences for financial stability as the PRC moves to further liberalize its financial system? If the PRC repeats the painful experiences of Mexico, Indonesia, and Thailand, then it might not be able to achieve its original goal of overcoming the middle-income trap. International experiences of financial liberalization, especially those of middle-income economies, should offer important lessons for the PRC. In our new research, based on cross-country data analysis, we find that financial liberalization, in general, reduces, not increases, financial instability. This powerful conclusion is valid whether financial instability is measured by crisis occurrence or by fragility indicators, such as impaired loans and net charge-offs. The only exception is that financial liberalization does not appear to significantly lower the probability of systemic banking crises, although it does lower the risk indicators for banks. These results have higher statistical significance and are greater in magnitude for the middle-income group than for the entire sample. The insignificant impact on banking crises, however, should be interpreted with caution. One of the possible explanations is that under the repressed financial regime, the government supports banks with an implicit or explicit blanket guarantee. This reduces the probability of an explicit banking crisis, although the banking risks may be even greater because of the moral hazard problem. In fact, government protection of banks could also increase the probability of a sovereign debt crisis or even a currency crisis before financial liberalization. If financial liberalization significantly reduces the likelihood of financial crises, especially in middle-income economies, then why did some middle-income economies experience financial crises following liberalization? We further investigate whether the pace of liberalization, the supervisory structure, and the institutional environment matter for outcomes of financial liberalization. We obtain three main findings. First, an excessively rapid pace of financial liberalization may increase financial risks. The net impact on financial instability depends on the relative importance of the “liberalization effect” and the “pace effect.” In essence, what the “pace effect” captures could simply be the prerequisite conditions and reform sequencing that are well discussed in the literature. Second, the quality of institutions, such as investor protection and law and order, also matter. International experiences indicate that investor protection can significantly reduce the probability of financial crises. Third, the central bank’s participation in financial regulation is helpful for reducing financial risks during financial liberalization. This is probably because central banks always play central roles in financial liberalization, especially in the liberalization of interest rates, exchange rates, and the capital account. If a central bank is responsible for financial regulation, its liberalization policies might be more cautious and prudent. Our research findings offer important policy implications for the PRC. (1) Further financial liberalization is necessary not only for sustaining strong economic growth but also for containing or reducing financial risks. (2) Gradual reform may still work better than the “big bang” approach, and sequencing is very important for avoiding the painful financial volatilities that many other middle-income countries have seen. (3) The government should also focus more on improving the quality of other institutions, especially market discipline, to contain financial risks. (4) It is better for the central bank to participate in financial regulation. The new regulatory system should focus exclusively on financial stability and shift from regulating institutions toward regulating functions. It should also become relatively independent to increase accountability. ________________________________________________________________ About the Author This submitted article was written by Qin Gou and Huang Yiping of Asia Pathways, the blog of The Asian Development Bank Institute was established in 1997 in Tokyo, Japan, to help build capacity, skills, and knowledge related to poverty reduction and other areas that support long-term growth and competitiveness in developing economies in the Asia-Pacific region. Continue Reading Entrepreneurship Women on Top in Tech – Chrissa McFarlane, Founder and CEO of Patientory Published 18 hours ago on April 24, 2018 By Marion Neubronner (Women on Top in Tech is a series about Women Founders, CEOs, and Leaders in technology. It aims to amplify and bring to the fore diversity in leadership in technology.) Chrissa McFarlane is the Founder and CEO of Patientory, a patient-centered enterprise solution on the blockchain to store, secure and access healthcare information in real-time. She is a leader and an entrepreneur with a passion for creating cutting-edge healthcare products that transform the face of healthcare delivery in the United States of America and abroad. What makes you do what you do? I am passionate about helping people, especially when it comes to their healthcare. This is my daily motivation for pushing forward in one of the most challenging industries to innovate. How did you rise in the industry you are in? Through my networks and maintaining a strong advisory board, I am able to make an impact. Why did you take on this role/start this startup especially since this is perhaps a stretch or challenge for you (or viewed as one since you are not the usual leadership demographics)? I took on the role and decided to start this startup primary to follow my passion and be an inspiration for other women who are seeking to start their own business. Do you have a mentor that you look up to in your industries or did you look for one or how did that work? I have multiple mentors. I met them through my networks. How did you make a match if you did, and how did you end up being mentored by him/her? Through introductions and after speaking with them I saw a character alignment that prompted me to ask them to by my mentor. Now as a leader how do you spot, develop, keep, grow and support your talent? Through one on one meetings, and team building. Do you consciously or unconsciously support diversity and why? I consciously support diversity because a diversity of thought breeds success in the workplace. It is important to have different lenses of thought to be represented. Our company is a representation of the people we serve. What is your take on what it takes to be a great leader in your industry and as a general rule of thumb? A great leader in healthcare is equipped to serve the people. Unlike many other industries, healthcare is centered around sustaining the health of the human being. You certainly need to encompass a passion for seeing individuals live and lead healthy lifestyles. Advice for others? In building emerging technology, education is always key to success. Our first Inaugural Blockchain Healthcare Summit will take place on May 31st in Atlanta, GA where we will discuss the current state of blockchain projects and opportunities for the future. If you’d like to get in touch with Chrissa McFarlane, please feel free to reach out to her on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrissamcfarlane/ To learn more about Patientory, please click here. Continue Reading Latest Popular Entrepreneurship7 hours ago Will Financial Liberalisation Trigger a Crisis in China? Investors8 hours ago Georges Tchokoua Entrepreneurship18 hours ago Women on Top in Tech – Chrissa McFarlane, Founder and CEO of Patientory Entrepreneurship1 day ago Why Angel Investors are Shaking Up the Global Startup Scene Investors1 day ago Emmanuelle Norchet Entrepreneurship3 weeks ago Women on Top in Tech – Melissa C. Guzy, Co-founder and Managing Partner of Arbor Ventures Callum Connects4 weeks ago Eng Poo Yang, Managing Director of Appvantage Asia Callum Connects1 week ago Joel Tay, CEO of Soft Space Entrepreneurship3 weeks ago Can Coworking Spaces Save Retail? Entrepreneurship4 weeks ago Uber’s Future with Grab? Media4 years ago Wise Leadership Media4 years ago Varun Agarwal, from failing in studies to founding a million-dollar company Media4 years ago The Next Tsunami – Asian Entrepreneurship Media4 years ago 7 Secrets That Made Steve Jobs Successful Innovative Asian Entrepreneurs4 years ago Joshua Hon, Founder Of Tern Bicycles Advertisement Trending Entrepreneurship3 weeks ago Women on Top in Tech – Melissa C. Guzy, Co-founder and Managing Partner of Arbor Ventures Callum Connects4 weeks ago Eng Poo Yang, Managing Director of Appvantage Asia Callum Connects1 week ago Joel Tay, CEO of Soft Space Entrepreneurship3 weeks ago Can Coworking Spaces Save Retail?